Posted 17 April 2012 - 12:55 PM
Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:42 PM
You are in a very small minority with that view.
Posted 18 April 2012 - 09:55 AM
ps. I have lot more things to watch. I can't even keep up with movies I really want to see, due to lack of free time. :/
Posted 18 April 2012 - 10:23 PM
the parts that weren't ripped off were completely terrible and the parts that were ripped off were done terribly as well
definatly not a fan
but then again there really wasn't much to expect here.
everyone knows the only reason why this film was made was to retain the rights to the franchise so I really wouldn't be suprised if Jack was right and this was a youtube fan film submission maded into a movie lol
I've spent my entire life pretending I'm not one....
Posted 19 April 2012 - 10:06 AM
I am sure 150% this is the case. I have no clue who currently holds rights to Hellraiser, but since last TWO Hellraiser came out in 2005, and remake is taking ages (just to get greenlight), studio was probably gonna lose rights... So they decided it's easier to make another DTV Hellraiser flick for $10.000, then pay for rights again (which probably cost at least $1m)
You know, I don't blame them. If I was in same situation, I would probably do the same thing, and by making Revelation, they don't lose rights. I am not sure how long can you keep rights without making a film. 6 years maybe? (even less for very popular mainstream franchise)
Posted 20 April 2012 - 01:17 PM
Posted 20 April 2012 - 07:30 PM